Why?
Not because of a court order or because you had a warrant for your arrest, no. Rather a federal or local law enforcement officer had a suspicion that you were an "Enemy" of the country and it was important to know who you were "talking to, what [you]'re saying, and what [you]'re planning."
So you're arrested, and on trial with "evidence" that was procured without a judge's approval, and sentenced to X (number of years in jail) for doing or planning to do Y (something that was determined as a crime by a law enforcement officer).
Your phone conversations were undoubtedly considered "your own" contractually with the phone company, and now they've been given to the government and used against you. Who do you blame?
I'd be a little upset with a corporation that broke it's agreement with me. I'd probably try to sue them, for lost work time, emotional damages and court fees, and because the evidence was obtained without a warrant, I'd try to get the case overturned.
But now, I can't.
Thanks to a piece of legislation passed by the Bush White House on Wednesday, THE TELEPHONE CORPORATIONS ARE NOT LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR HANDING OVER PERSONAL DATA.
Which means they are completely immune from legal action taken by customers for breaking a contract. 40 cases against telecom providers are now null and void, and will be turned over by the bills passing.
While we're on the subject, how useful or important is wiretapping? According to uscourts.gov, in 2007 (total domestic and abroad) 2,119 intercepts were installed, and 3,106 intercepts were made....a mere 920 of which led to incrimination. (I'll do the math, they are 29% effective at making incriminations.)
You might say "Well, that's 920 criminals behind bars!" And 2,186 conversations that didn't need to be listened too. Maybe we caught some bad guys...but what if we had a federal agent or local cop broke up with his girlfriend and listened to her calls to stalk her? Or if we had a private investigator slip money to a federal officer to listen in on a target for a case?
Maybe the cost isn't that much? Hopefully? No. Again, the number of taps? 2,119 taps at $48,477 A PIECE! That is $102,722,763. TAXPAYER MONEY. Think about that next time you look at your "Tax" section of your paycheck stub.
Obama supported the bill saying, "This was not an easy call for me. I know that the...bill that passed the House is far from perfect." McCain was not on roll call for the vote.
____________________________________________________________________
What kind of world do we live in? I am now completely beside myself. We can't even take legal action against an independent corporation because the government is protecting;
Their interests.
Their money.
Rather than our legal rights.
Isn't it the job of the government representatives to protect it's voters rights and freedoms? Like the freedom for legal reparations or an independent court system, free from the constraints of the legislative or executive direct order?
The democrats promised in 2006 that, "a Democratic-led Congress will not be a rubber stamp for the White House."-(Pelosi) Thanks for that one guys. Way to win one for the team, and not bend over to the game of fear mongering, (by the way, a reminder that we are still at Terror Alert Level YELLOW, as of March 19th. Thank you for staying vigilant.)
By the way, on this particular bill Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint offered to give contributions to the Democrats in congress averaging:
"If you want twice the money, vote our way" says the Telephone companies. And this amount is a lot less than legal damages that the public would have brought onto Verizon, AT&T and Sprint. Which would have probably numbered in the millions.$8,359 to each Democrat who changed their position to support immunity for the Telecom industry (94 Dems)
$4,987 to each Democrat who remained opposed to immunity for Telcos (116 Dems)
What the fuck happened? Why is this even accepted? I have had enough of the lies and the crap about "protecting" us.
I'll say what I truly think, It was their fault that September day.
No. They didn't orchestrate it, this isn't my conspiracy theory. They dropped the ball. We had a whole system of early warnings and notices of Bin Laden's activities. We had intel that wasn't being acted on. Read the 9/11 commission report, an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002.
Go on and read chapter 8, "The System Was Blinking Red." in it, reads:
[as early as] June 22, 2001 the CIA notified all its station chiefs about intelligence suggesting a possible al Qaeda suicide attack on a U.S.target over the next few days. DCITenet askedMake no mistake, they messed up that day, dropped the ball and because of it more than 3000 people met a horrifying end. Remember how strong we were? We had faith in ourselves as a country, as a people and as a Nation. The government was the last thing on our mind, because we had faith that they would follow the people's demands.
that all U.S. ambassadors be briefed.
We now have nothing but fear, disparity and death. We have all been playing into the same hands of those who refuse to protect us, time and time again.
I am deeply saddened and upset at realizing these things, having to even express these sentiments. But through the frustration and pain, I have found a voice. One that I wish to use and call for the people of the United States to stand up for what is right and just and fair. To hold those accountable, both domestic and abroad, that allowed and continue to allow tragedy to occur on our own soil. To expect a government that keeps its promises and protects it's people with the fervor and intensity that we pay them hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for.
Remember to vote, what you decide on will change the way you live your life.
2 comments:
But Steve, what can I, the normal (uninformed) citizen, do about these sorts of things? How can I change the country?
Nicely-put Steve. I share your sentiments and feel your frustration! It is unfortunate-actually downright scandalous- that the democrats have have failed to stand up for anything. They (except for a treasured few - Kucinich, Feingold) are just cooperating with and cashing in on the corporate hijacking of Washington.
Seth raises a pertinent question. What should we do? Blow something up? I'm petitioning to get Ralph Nader on the ballot in Kansas. I know this small action, this mere blip of expended energy, will likely be swallowed by the infrastructure that is consuming our humanity. But it feels good, and we should at least have some choice. At least Nader has a record of standing up for the people, not for the corporations.
Post a Comment